News

Press release about misuse of the "Mahdi" Discourse

The Valuable Members of our Visual, auditory, and written press,

Based on the news and comments in our press that led to misunderstandings, Some discourses and actions that have been turned into a smear campaign against ASSAM "The Association of Justice Defenders Strategic Studies Center"  and SADAT "International Defense Consultancy" that I was the FOUNDER, it creates again an intense agenda in our press.

ASSAM "The Association of Justice Defenders Strategic Studies Center" is a Civil Society Organization that was founded to offer a ISLAMIC UNION MODEL for directors, to gather Islamic countries under one will by establishment the required institutions and studying the necessary legislation for these institutions.

3. ULUSLARARASI ASSAM İSLAM BİRLİĞİ KONGRESİ AÇIŞ KONUŞMASI

19-20 ARALIK

 

45 Ülkeden (ABD, Afganistan, Azerbaycan, Bangladeş, Bosna Hersek, Burkina Faso, Fildişi Sahili, Filistin, Çad, Gana, Gambiya, Güney Afrika, Hindistan, İspanya, Irak, Kazakistan, Keşmir, Kiribati, Kırgızistan, Libya, Malezya, Mısır, Moritanya, Nijer, Nijerya, Moğolistan, Özbekistan, Pakistan, Romanya, Rusya, Senegal, Siera Leone, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriye, Suudi Arabistan, Somali, Tanzanya, Tayland, Togo, Uganda, Ukrayna, Umman, Yemen ve Zimbabwe) temsilciler katılmıştır. 3. Uluslararası ASSAM İslâm Birliği Kongresine

KONGRE ASSAM “Adaleti savunanlar Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi Derneği”nin Organizasyonu, Üsküdar ve Dumlupınar Üniversiteleri, İDSB “İslam Dünyası Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları Birliği” ve ASDER “Adaleti savunanlar Derneği”nin iştiraki;

THY, MKEK ASELSAN, TAİ, HAVELSAN, EMİN EVİM, MOR YAPIM, EKOL GÜVENLİK, AKİT TV, SADAT ve SAVUNMA SANAYİ DERGİLİK, Bursa Büyükşehir, Bahçelievler, Beyoğlu, Esenler, Sancaktepe ve Sultangazi Belediyeleri, EMİNEVİM ve EKOL Güvenlik Şirketinin desteği ile yapılmıştır.

In the article written by Mr. Orhan UĞUROĞLU and published in Yeniçağ newspaper on 12.08.2019;

“Is the Ministry of National Education and the Ministry of National Defense are also privatized?

 be privatized ....

Private schools from primary school to university have been built, education has been privatized ... As for the remaining public schools, get the points if you can, if you cannot get them, come on Imam Hatip…

The Ministry of National Defense also the Military privatized ...

Give the money, get an evacuation

The tank pallet factory was also privatized by giving it to the partnership of Qatar army,

A Special Armed Army SADAT was also established to the presidential chief advisor, Adnan Tanrıverdi

It begins in the form and continues with the criticisms to the privatized public activities.

Dear UĞUROĞLU in his article, defined that private schools, which are opened within the framework of the state curriculum, under the state control and even minimum physical conditions in an environment drawn by the state as a privatization of education. 

Within this scope, he evaluated the application of paid military service, privatization of the operating right of the tank pallet factory for a while and the establishment of SADAT A.Ş., as privatization of also the Ministry of National Defense.

We think that the evaluation of SADAT Defense as an alternative to Turkish Armed Forces is due to insufficient or incorrect information sources. SADAT Defense clearly defined its purpose, activities, and scope of work through its website, and its establishment was announced in the Newspaper of Official Commercial on February 12, 2012.

 Mr. Adnan Tanriverdi has explained several times how the idea of SADAT Defense establishment was emerged. This explanation is available on the website of SADAT Defense.

Dozens of decisive decisions have been taken and convictions have been made regarding to the investigation Concerning forgery and the denial of similar articles and writings about SADAT Defense.

The intendment and intention of SADAT Defense are clear, and it has no other back plan. The aim of SADAT Defense is to consider the interests of the Republic of Turkey friendly and allied countries.

It can be summarized as follows:

  • Provide strategic consultancy to the security forces (the armed forces and police corps),
  • Provide training for members of the security forces on the subjects they need in order to defend their country,
  • Mediate in the procurement of war weapons and vehicles demanded by the security forces to defend their country,
  • Creating a defense and defense industry cooperation environment between friendly countries, providing consultancies on these issues, establishing a market environment for the products of Turkish defense industries, and providing interstate organizations on related issues,

Carried out company activities as determined by the relevant legislation.

SADAT Defense is not a special army, an armed force.

To the public opinion, it is announced with respect.

 

The interview with Mr. Melih TANRIVERDİ Chairman of the Board Directors of SADAT Company, which is the first and unique of its kind in the field of military consultancy and training outside of our country that is the protector for the geopolitical and geostrategic geography; at the same time, it is the company that carries out its works in coordination with the official foreign policy of the Turkish Republic in addition to it is going over its way to be the pearl and pride for its country in the near future.

Tags: , , , ,

 

 

TURKISH REPUBLIC

ISTANBUL

1. MAGISTRATE COURT

DIFFERENT ISSUES DECISION

DIFFERENT ISSUES DECISION: 2019/2267 DIFFERENT ISSUES.

JUDGER: Zafer DAŞKIN 153128.

CLERK: Yusuf Kenan YABANTAĞ 229062.

PLAINTIFF: SADAT A.S. International Defense Consulting.

DEFENCE COUNSEL: Ahmet Cengiz Tangören - Ahrnet Taylan.

COUNTERPART: www.twitter.com.

DEMAND: Access blocking Request.

DATE OF DEMAND: 25/04/2019.

DATE OF DECISION: 25/04/2019.

The defense counsels Mr. Ahmet Cengiz Tangören & Mr. Ahmet Taylan of SADAT International Defense Consulting have submitted a petition, which was attached in above division and recorded under different issues order, to our judiciary in the date of 25/04/2019.

Documents were audited.

REQUIRED THAT:

The defense counsels Mr. Ahmet Cengiz Tangören & Mr. Ahmet Taylan of SADAT International Defense Consulting have submitted a petition which was provided in 25/04/2019 includes Access blocking Request to publications that were non-real and attacking their personal clients’ rights in accordance with article 9.1 of the Law No. 5651.

Article 9.1 of the Law No. 5651;

(1) Real and legal persons, institutions, and organizations who are alleging, that their personal rights have been violated due to broadcast content made on internet, have right to request removal of broadcast content by warning methods in case of failure to reach this content or by requesting to the judge who may block broadcast content directly.

(2) The requests providing by persons, who alleging their personal rights have been violated due to broadcast content made on internet, should be replied at most within twenty-four hours by the content and / or location provider.

(3) Due to broadcast content on the Internet and according to requests of those who their personal rights have been violated, the judge may decide to block access within the range specified in this article.

(4) The judge decides to ban access to content on the basis of this article, by blocking the access to the content (in the form of URL, etc.) only in relation to the posts, section, portion where the violation of the right to personality occurs. The decision to prevent full access to the posts cannot be given on the website unless requested. However, if the judge finds that the violation cannot be prevented by blocking access to the content by specifying the URL address, he can also decide to block accessing to the entire posts on the website, with the proviso that specify the reason."

Upon checking application Form and its attachments, it was found that the action was taken due to violating personal rights by publishing the posts in the URL: https://twitter.com/search?q=%40mrubin1971%20sadat&src=typd without consent of the requesting side, for these reasons the APPLICATION WAS APPROVED as such.

Law No. 5651 Article 9; The judge decides to ban access to content on the basis of this article, by blocking the access to the content (in the form of URL, etc.) only in relation to the posts, section, portion where the violation of the right to personality occurs. The decision to prevent full access to the posts cannot be given on the website unless requested. However, if the judge finds that the violation cannot be prevented by blocking access to the content by specifying the URL address, he can also decide to block accessing to the entire posts on the website, with the proviso that specify the reason.

With this provision and after it became clear that https:// https://twitter.com/mrubin1971 was the domain name on the mentioned webpage, the following decision was taken as to denial of the request.